Medical PROOF The COVID-19 Vaccine IS Murder

Don’t Take My Word For It, Take DOCTOR Vernon Coleman’s Word For It

COVID-19 Vaccine Is Murder

Take The Word Of MANY Doctors

I know it’s hard for a lot of people to believe that their own government would do something that would harm them. Unfortunately for all of humanity, it has been happening since our existence. I’m just a messenger, disseminating TRUTHFUL information. Now there is medical proof that the COVID-19 vaccine is murder

If you know me, you may or may not like me, but are you going to let that stand in the way of receiving the TRUTH? TRUTH that I am trying to bring to your eyes and ears. “Let those with eyes see and those with ears hear.”

Let go of your fear, you have ABSOLUTELY nothing to be fearful of. The ego is the split part of the mind that controls fear…fear, its lifeblood. The ego’s purpose is fear, because only the fearful can be egotistic. The ego’s logic is as impeccable as that of the Holy Spirit, because your mind has the means at its disposal to side with Heaven or earth, as it elects. But again, remember that both are in you. Which one do you choose to side with? Always remember, the ego wants nothing more than to keep you in trouble, by making you decide incorrectly.

Go to Dr Coleman’s site and check out other articles on the plandemic.

From Dr Vernon Coleman MB ChB DSc VernonColeman.org

“It’s the 22nd November 2021 and this is the moment when the jabbing has to stop.

A couple of hours ago Darren Smith, the editor of the excellent The Light Paper, sent me a paper from the medical journal Circulation which proves that the covid-19 jabbing experiment has to stop today. I believe that any doctor or nurse who gives one of the mRNA covid jabs after today will in due course be struck off the appropriate register and arrested.

The journal Circulation is a well-respected publication. It’s 71-years-old, its articles are peer reviewed and in one survey it was rated the world’s no 1 journal in the cardiac and cardiovascular system category.

I’m going to quote the final sentence of the abstract which appears at the beginning of the article. This is all I, you – or anyone else – needs to know.

`We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy and other vascular events following vaccination.’

That’s it. That’s the death bell for the covid-19 mRNA jabs.

The endothelium is a layer of cells lining blood vessels and lymphatic vessels. T cells are a type of white cell.

We always knew these jabs were experimental. My video in December 2020, just under a year ago, warned about these specific risks. I read out a list of possible adverse events published officially by the American Government.

But now we have the proof of the link.

The mRNA jab is, remember, known not to stop people catching covid. And it is known not to stop people spreading it. I don’t believe anyone disputes these facts.

And yet vast numbers of deaths and serious injuries have occurred among people who have been jabbed. Look at the item entitled ‘Updated: how many are the vaccines killing?’ on my websites.

Now we have the evidence to stop the jabbing programmes.

In the study quoted in Circulation, a total of 566 patients aged 28 to 97 were tested. They were equally divided among men and women.

‘At the time of this report,’ says the author, ‘these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vaccine.’

At the very least, the use of these jabs must stop now. Immediately, until more long-term tests are done.

If there were any journalists left in the mainstream media, this news would be lead item on all TV and radio programmes and be on the front pages of all newspapers.

Thank heavens for free speech platforms such as BNT which enables me to bring you this news.

I’ve said for a year that this jab was an experiment – certain to kill and injure.

We’ve always known that to experiment on people without their full consent and understanding – after disclosing all the risks and potential side effects – is a crime.

Now the evidence exists that must stop this experiment.

If the covid jab experiment continues after today then we know for absolute sure that this is not a medical treatment, it is a cull.

Please share this video immediately with everyone you know.

Thank you.”

Peace, Love & Blessings To All, Especially To Those Who Have Received The Jab And Those Considering Getting It! PLEASE Don’t Get A Poison Injected Into Your Body, That Will Surely Cause You Trouble, For A “Virus” (The Cold) that has A 99.9% Survival Rate.

Oliver

Jim Jordan Says He Can Prove Fauci LIED, And He Does!

Dr Fauci IS A Criminal

Jim Jordan proves Dr Fauci lied about Gain of Function research at the Wuhan lab that American tax dollars paid for! If you still believe that Dr Fauci or Dr FauXci, as many people call him, if you still believe he is telling the truth EVER and that he’s not trying to cover his ass, then watch the video, the transcript is right below. Then after you’re done, type Dr Fauci in the search box on the right and read the other articles that expose his hypocrisy. Fauci’s NIH Gave Tens of Millions in Grants to Chinese Labs

Jim Jordan Proves Dr Fauci Lied About Gain Of Function Research At Wuhan Lab China
Dr Fauci Gives Speech Before President trump took Office

You’ll learn how he had a hand in the spread of HIV, you’ll learn that he knew, before President Trump started his first term, that there would be a pandemic (SARS-Cov-2), how would he know that? If he was a Seer maybe, he’s not. He’s just another Marxist from New York, trying to destroy The United States, along with his comrades, Andrew Cuomo, Chris Cuomo, Bill de Blasio, Letitia James and all the other politicians that blindly follow these criminals.

Dr Fauci Is Worse Than A TickHe Is Sucking The Life Blood Out Of The United States!

Jim Jordan Transcript Proving Dr Fauci Lied

Friday January 31st, 2020 at 10: 32 p.m. Dr Fauci gets an email from Christian Anderson, Christian Anderson’s, a British researcher, who’s received numerous grants from NIH. Two really important sentences are in that email, two sentences that get Dr Fauci’s attention. The first is this:

“The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome, so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features look engineered.”

Christian Anderson

Again, this is January 31st, 2020. Second sentence:

“Eddie [Holmes], Bob [Garry], Mike [Ferguson] and myself all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory.”

Christian Anderson

Email arrives 10:32 to Dr Fauci on January 31st, 2020, two hours later, two hours later at 12:29 in the morning, Dr Fauci sends an email to his top deputy, Mr Hugh Auchincloss. The guy has worked for Fauci for 15 years, part of his inner circle. Sends it, subject line says: “IMPORTANT”, in all capital letters. He attaches a paper on gain of function research written, by Dr Baric and Dr Shi. Dr Shi of course, is the so-called bat lady, bat woman, the lady who does research in the Wuhan China lab.

This email, Dr Fauci says again, to his top deputy:

“It is essential that we speak. this A.M., keep your cell phone on, read this paper, you will have tasks to do today, that must be done.”

Dr Fauci

Notice the intensity, notice the focus. I mean this is “the house is on fire” email here. Now, two hours after that, at 2:48 in the morning, Dr Fauci’s busy this morning, 12:29 that email he sent to Dr Auchincloss, his top deputy two hours later at 2:48 in the morning, he sends another email, this one to Robert Kadlec assistant HHS secretary, Trump appointee, not part of his inner circle, and he attaches a different article to this email. One that says:

“The virus came from an animal that downplays any lab leak theory”. Now again, notice the tone of this one: “Bob this just came out today, gives a balanced view.

Best,

Tony”

I mean totally different from the previous. This is one like: “Oh, if you get a chance read this, gives a balanced view.” So the tone is different, but also that sentence gives a balanced view. It’s not true either. That’s just not accurate.

This article downplays, as I said, the lab leak theory, “emphasizes evolutionary cause to the virus”. What happens next? What happens next? Later that same morning, later that same morning, at 11:47 a.m, Dr Fauci’s deputy gets back to him. I just want to read you this whole email.

“The paper you sent me”, the one he sent him that was written by the neurologist from Wuhan China and Dr Baric, “The paper you sent me says the experiments were performed before the gain of function pause, but have since been reviewed and approved by NIH.”

Mr Hugh Auchincloss

Not sure what that means, since Emily, someone else who works for Dr Fauci, is sure that no Coronavirus work has gone through the P3 framework, which, of course, is the oversight body, that’s supposed to approve any grant dollars going for gain of function research.

No Coronavirus work has gone through the P3 framework, final sentence:

“She will try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work abroad.”

Mr Hugh Auchincloss

She will try to determine if our fingerprints are on any of this. All these emails happen in 13 hours, so 13 hours after Dr Fauci gets the initial email from Christian Anderson saying,

“looks like this virus is engineered not consistent with evolutionary theory.”

Christian Anderson

Dr Fauci knows some important facts.

  1. Dr Fauci knows there is a lethal virus on the loose that started in Wuhan China.
  2. He knows the American taxpayers have funded gain of function research in Wuhan, China.
  3. He knows that the research grant didn’t go through the required oversight board.
  4. He knows the virus quote, “looks engineered” and quote “not consistent with evolutionary theory” and finally
  5. Dr Fauci knows he may have ties to this work in China.

His fingerprints in fact may be on this. So what does Dr Fauci do next. after he says, Oh whatever, what does he do next? He organizes a conference call for later that same day, I mean this is the busiest 24 hours I think I’ve ever, he organizes a conference call, 12 people on the call, Dr Fauci and 11 virologists from around the world. Virologists who’ve gotten millions of American tax dollars over the past several years.

Here Are Those Virologists

  1. Bob Garry
  2. Christian Drosten
  3. Tony Fauci
  4. Mike Ferguson
  5. Ron Fouchier
  6. Eddie Holmes
  7. Marion Koopmans
  8. Stefan Pöhlmann
  9. Andrew Rambaut
  10. Paul Schreier
  11. Patrick Valance

Now look at this list. Here’s a list of people, there’s only two Americans on the list, Tony Fauci and one other, most of them from around the world, as I said. I think the first thing you notice is who’s not on the call, who’s not on the list, is Dr Kadlec on the list? The guy he sent the email to at three in the morning. Is Dr Redfield, the head of CDC?

Dr Jarrar, who’s with us today, assistant secretary at HHS at the time? Dr Burks, the lady who’s, soon to be COVID response coordinator? In fact, there’s no one from the government on the call except Tony Fauci, Tony Fauci and 11 other individuals who got a bunch of American tax dollars over the years. What happened on the conference call? The short answer is we don’t know? We don’t know what they talked about. I mean, I think, we’ve got a good idea, we don’t know for sure, but we do know what happened four days later.

Four days later, February 4th, 2020, Christian Anderson, the guy who started it all, who said “the virus looks engineered”. Christian Anderson said this four days later, the crack, the quote:

“The crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered. That is demonstrably false.”

Christian Anderson

What? In four days this guy went from “this looks engineered” to now, “that’s demonstrably false”, four days he went from “this, isn’t consistent with evolutionary theory.” Now we know it’s totally evolutionary? But it gets even better, it gets even better.

Mr Anderson and three of the other people on this call write an article a few weeks later. That says “COVID is not a laboratory construct”, and while they’re writing that article there’s an email from March 6th, where Mr Anderson offers to let Dr Fauci edit the article before it’s published and here’s the kicker, here’s the kicker:

When the article is published, Dr Fauci cites it at a White House press conference when he is asked by a reporter about the origin of the virus, cites the very article he put in motion on the conference call and he was allowed to edit, at the White House, where he’s supposed to be giving the American people the truth, he references an article that he manufactured.

Now, maybe I’m wrong about all this, maybe it didn’t work out this way. I think I’m right. Maybe it didn’t work out this way, but it would have been nice, Mr chairman, if Dr Fauci would come today and answer our questions, he could have come here and defended himself, but he didn’t have the courage to do it.

And you know who else wouldn’t come, remember that email about the P3 framework? We invited Dr Hassell to come too, he’s the individual who chairs that oversight board. We invited him to come today too, and he wouldn’t come. They, I, I’m convinced these guys knew right from the get-go what the truth was and they misled the American people.

Oh here’s, the other thing. You know that conference call, that conference call? We got the emails regarding the conference call from February 2nd. All these guys, all these guys were emailing back and forth, they were on that conference call. Here’s what we got on the foyer request: here’s all their emails! Every single thing is redacted.

Every single thing is redacted about what took place in that conference call, because I’m convinced it was at that conference call where they said we got to cover our tracks and again maybe I’m wrong, maybe I’m wrong, but Dr Fauci could have been sitting right there and answering our questions and he wouldn’t come today. I yield back.

Thank you, Mr Jordan, and let the record reflect that Dr Fauci was invited Friday afternoon. He declined

Peace, Love & Blessings To All, Especially To Dr Fauci And All His Cohorts!!!

Oliver

Federal Lawsuit Seeks Immediate Halt of COVID Vaccines, Cites Whistleblower Testimony Claiming CDC Is Under-Counting Vaccine Deaths

America’s Frontline Doctors filed a motion to stop the use of Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) COVID vaccines for anyone under 18, anyone with natural immunity or anyone who hasn’t received informed consent.

Federal Lawsuit Against The COVID Vaccine + A Little Psychosis

First a little Psychosis from those who hastily went out and inoculated themselves with that COVID-19 poison.

I logged onto Facebook today and saw two profiles within minutes of each other, one of them was a confused friend of mine and the other from an equally confused person. There’s this thing that people are putting on there profile pictures, like a badge of courage, but more like a badge of confusion really. It’s in the lower left corner. I took it off one of the ones that I saw. The globe is round, it just looks that way because of the way I erased the photo.

I named it “The COVID Badge Of Confusion”

covid badge of confusion

Naturally, I had to make my own version that I posted immediately on my Facebook page.

It says: “I Did NOT Get The COVID-19 Shot. You Are Taking Your Life Into Your Own Hands If You Get That Shot! Smarten Up!”

I had covid 19
OlyManifesto.com

Here’s a link to a post I did recently explaining how up to 50,000 people who have received that shot have died. It is a shot and NOT a vaccine. If you did get that shot you now have God knows how many nano-bots floating around in your body. You have essentially turned yourself into a Manchurian Candidate without the government ever contacting you.

This article will shed some light on COVID Vaccine Deaths

Because of the type of shot that it is, the COVID-19 shot has mRNA which alters the human genome, thus making you a patentable object, so says the Supreme Court.

This is From The Defender – Children’s Health News & Views

By  Megan Redshaw

The Defender is experiencing censorship on many social channels. Be sure to stay in touch with the news that matters by subscribing to our top news of the day. It’s free.

America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) filed a motion July 19, seeking immediate injunctive relief in Alabama Federal District Court to stop the use of Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) COVID vaccines — Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson (J&J) — for three groups of Americans.

According to a press release, AFLDS is asking to immediately stop administration of experimental COVID vaccines in anyone 18 and younger, all those who have recovered from COVID and acquired natural immunity, and every other American who has not received informed consent as defined by federal law.

The 67-page motion requests the judge issue a preliminary injunction pursuant to § 360bbb–3(b)(1)(C) for the following reasons:

  • There is no emergency, which is a prerequisite to issuing EUA and EUA renewals for COVID vaccines.
  • There is “no serious or life-threatening disease or condition.”
  • Vaccines do not diagnose, treat or prevent SARS-CoV-2 or COVID.
  • Known and potential risks of the vaccine outweigh their known and potential benefits.
  • There are adequate, approved and available alternatives to vaccines.
  • Healthcare professionals and vaccine candidates are not adequately informed.

The authors of the motion attached a declaration by a whistleblower who came forward alleging deaths occurring within 72 hours of receiving a COVID vaccine are significantly under-reported in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) maintained by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).Tell Schools/Universities No Vaccine Mandates for Children/Young Adults!

As of July 9, reported deaths in the VAERS totaled 10,991. Of those, 4,593 occurred within 72-hours of vaccination.

The whistleblower — a computer programmer who developed more than 100 distinct healthcare fraud algorithms, and who has expertise in healthcare data analytics that allows her to access Medicare and Medicaid data obtained by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Systems (CMS) — filed a sworn statement under penalty of perjury alleging the actual number of COVID vaccine-related deaths is closer to 45,000.

The whistleblower alleged that VAERS, while extremely useful, is under-reported by a conservative factor of at least five.

In her statement, she said:

“On July 9, 2021, there were 9,048 deaths reported in VAERS. I verified these numbers by collating all of the data from VAERS myself, not relying on a third party to report them. In tandem, I queried data from CMS medical claims with regard to vaccines and patient deaths, and have assessed that the deaths occurring within 3 days of vaccination are higher than those reported in VAERS by a factor of at least 5. This would indicate the true number of vaccine-related deaths was at least 45,000. Put in perspective, the swine flu vaccine was taken off the market which only resulted in 53 deaths.”

AFLDS said the findings were shocking, and informed consent is impossible when safety data is not accurate.

In a press release, AFLDS said:

“It is unlawful and unconstitutional to administer experimental agents to individuals who cannot make an informed decision as to the true benefits and risks to the vaccine on an independent basis. They must be of an age or a capacity to make informed decisions and have been provided with all of the risk/benefit information necessary to make an informed decision.”

One of the named plaintiffs, Deborah Sobczak, the mother of a 15- and 17-year-old, said in the press release:

“My child will not be the subject of an experiment. What kind of monsters are we allowing to control us? Perfectly healthy children have developed heart inflammation, brain bleeding and even died! I have had enough. I am not sacrificing my child so a pharmaceutical company can experiment on her. This madness has to stop.”

There is no emergency warranting EUA of COVID vaccines, plaintiffs allege

According to the complaint, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) secretary, named as one of the defendants in the lawsuit, declared on Feb. 4, 2020, pursuant to § 360bbb–3(b)(1)(C), that SARS-CoV-2 created a “public health emergency.”

This initial emergency declaration has been renewed repeatedly and remains in force today — a necessary legal prerequisite for the issuance of vaccine EUAs, the complaint states. EUA allowed the mass use of the vaccines by the American public before the completion of the standard regimen of clinical trials and FDA approval.

Plaintiffs allege the emergency declaration and its multiple renewals are illegal because there is no underlying emergency. Using HHS COVID death data, SARS CoV-2 has an overall survivability rate of 99.8% globally, which increases to 99.97% for persons under the age of 70. This is consistent with the seasonal flu, the complaint states.

Plaintiffs argue HHS deliberately inflated COVID case data

Plaintiffs allege HHS’ data is deliberately inflated. On March 24, 2020, HHS changed the rules applicable to coroners and others responsible for producing death certificates and making “cause of death” determinations exclusively for COVID.

The rule change states: “COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death.”

According to the complaint, HHS statistics showed 95% of deaths classified as “COVID-19 deaths” involved an average of four additional comorbidities. Plaintiffs claim the CDC knew the rules for coding and selection of the underlying cause of death would result in COVID being the underlying cause more often than not.

Plaintiffs said the actual number of COVID cases is also far lower than the reported number due to emergency use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, which are used as a diagnostic tool for COVID. The PCR tests are themselves experimental products, authorized by the FDA under separate EUAs. The package inserts state PCR tests should not be used to diagnose COVID.

The complaint alleges the way in which the PCR tests are being administered knowingly guarantees an unacceptably high number of false positive results.

COVID vaccine risks undisclosed and under-reported, lawsuit says 

AFLDS medico-legal researchers analyzed the accumulated COVID vaccine risk data and found migration of the pathogenic SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the body. Yet vaccines were authorized without any studies demonstrating where the spike proteins traveled in the body following vaccination, how long they remain active and what effect they have, the complaint states.

AFLDS researchers analyzed VAERS and discovered an increased risk of death from COVID vaccines. The database indicated vaccine deaths in the first quarter of 2021 represented a 12,000% to 25,000% increase in vaccine deaths, year-on-year.

From 2009 to 2019, there were 1529 reported deaths associated with all vaccines reported to VAERS, according to the motion. In the first quarter of 2021, there were more than 4,000 reported deaths with 99% of all reported vaccine deaths in 2021 attributed to the COVID vaccine. Only 1% were attributed to other vaccines in the system.

Plaintiffs also disclosed evidence of reproductive harm, vascular disease, autoimmune disease, neurological damage and they highlighted an increased risk of harm for children with COVID vaccines to support their position.

Why the secrecy around V-Safe data?

The complaint called attention to the secrecy of the CDC’s V-Safe system — a parallel system used to track reported adverse events via a smartphone app controlled exclusively by the CDC.

Plaintiffs raised concerns that information in V-Safe exceeds that in VAERS. They claim VAERS is inaccurate because it potentially includes fewer than 1% of all vaccine adverse events, and the federal government is failing to provide data from other monitoring sources such as V-Safe, CMS and the military.

Plaintiffs stated informed consent cannot be given without understanding the risks. They said they can’t help but wonder why HHS would fail to disclose to the public critical information related to risk from it’s reporting systems, “particularly in light of the fact that they have had the time and resources to study and extend the authorizations on the vaccines, build an enormous vaccine marketing machine and roll out vaccine clinics all over the nation.”

The lawsuit was filed by several law firms, including RENZ Law. The complaint and whistleblower declaration can be read here.

Peace, Love & Blessings To All,

Especially To Those Who Have Received That Shot!

Oliver